What Is This Thing Called Science?

Alan F. Chalmers

Pages

436

Year

2013

Difficulty

Moderate

Themes

scientific method, induction, falsificationism, paradigms, realism

The book that has taught the philosophy of science to more first-year students than any other. Pick it when you want the full course, worked through carefully rather than sketched.

Why Consider This One

Where Okasha gives you the shape of the field, Chalmers gives you the reasoning behind every turn. He builds the whole thing from the ground up around a single question, what makes knowledge scientific, and shows you why each answer failed and forced the next. Naive inductivism collapses, so Popper offers falsificationism, which runs into trouble of its own, which sets up Kuhn’s paradigms and Lakatos’s research programmes, and on toward the realism debate. Because Chalmers actually walks through the objections instead of listing positions, you finish understanding not just what philosophers of science believe but why they were driven to it.

That makes it the natural second step, or a strong first step for anyone who prefers depth to brevity. It has been revised across four editions since 1976 and stayed a standard course book throughout, which tells you how well the explanations hold up in a classroom. Newcomers who want to be led slowly and thoroughly, rather than briskly, will get more from this than from a shorter overview.

What to Expect

Around 430 pages in the fourth edition, including a long postscript that uses the history of atomism to test the ideas against a real case. The tone is patient and pedagogical, closer to a very good lecturer than to a trade book. No technical background is required, but it rewards steady attention, so treat it as a book to work through rather than skim.

What to Read Next

Similar authors